header-logo header-logo

Search & seizure: what’s reasonable?

01 March 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail
161579
Neil Parpworth assesses some key & worrying provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill
  • The Criminal Justice Bill expands police powers against citizens.
  • Covers clause 22 on the seizing of bladed articles and suspected stolen goods.
  • Covers clause 24 on warrantless entry and search.

At the time of writing, the latest Criminal Justice Bill is at the Report stage in the House of Commons. It contains a raft of provisions which range from addressing nuisance begging and rough sleeping to introducing a duty of candour in policing. For present purposes, however, the two clauses of particular interest seek to confer additional powers on the police to seize bladed articles and to enter premises to search for and seize stolen goods. Should they become law, such powers will inevitably impact upon the rights and freedoms of citizens. Accordingly, it is important to assess their scope and extent and determine whether they are subject to appropriate safeguards which are likely to prevent their misuse.

Clause 22

This provision seeks to confer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll