header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Search & seizure: what’s reasonable?

161579
Neil Parpworth assesses some key & worrying provisions in the Criminal Justice Bill
  • The Criminal Justice Bill expands police powers against citizens.
  • Covers clause 22 on the seizing of bladed articles and suspected stolen goods.
  • Covers clause 24 on warrantless entry and search.

At the time of writing, the latest Criminal Justice Bill is at the Report stage in the House of Commons. It contains a raft of provisions which range from addressing nuisance begging and rough sleeping to introducing a duty of candour in policing. For present purposes, however, the two clauses of particular interest seek to confer additional powers on the police to seize bladed articles and to enter premises to search for and seize stolen goods. Should they become law, such powers will inevitably impact upon the rights and freedoms of citizens. Accordingly, it is important to assess their scope and extent and determine whether they are subject to appropriate safeguards which are likely to prevent their misuse.

Clause 22

This provision seeks to confer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll