header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Andrew Stenning
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Searching questions

Are HIPs working for you? asks Andrew Stenning

There have been some calls in the past to scrap HIPs which have been backed by statements such as “it would slow the market down” and “it increases costs involved in buying and selling”.

However, a recent poll has been commissioned with over 175 housing industry professionals, which included mortgage lenders, estate agents and property investors who said that they were in favour of HIPs.

Grant Shapps, shadow housing minister for the conservatives, has in the past been clear about the conservatives’ view on scrapping HIPs.

However, it is also worth mentioning that their view is changing as they recently indicated approval of an exchange ready HIP, we can only conclude that they are now beginning to understand the benefits HIPs bring to the conveyancing process.

It is also worth remembering that the majority of information contained within a HIP was always required during the buying and selling process. The Property Information Questionnaire is the most recent addition to the HIP and adds even further quality to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll