header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017 / Kathryn Purkis , Kathryn Purkis
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Section 22 & recovery proceedings

Kathryn Purkis analyses the limitation periods applicable to claims brought by personal representatives

  • On a proper view, s 22 of the Limitation Act 1980 cannot be used to argue that personal representatives have a special 12-year limitation period within which to sue for mistaken overpayments.

An executrix, Hanna, believes she is dealing with a very large estate, with complex assets. A deserving close family member and residual beneficiary, Peter, asks early on in the administration for a distribution of a sum that appears to the executrix to be a small proportion of his ultimate entitlement under the will. The distribution is readily made out of cash. After a while, however, it begins to become apparent to Hanna that all is not well with the testator’s investments: they include a going concern which carries significant liabilities. Worse, there are some very large specific legacies, the payment of which will take priority over any entitlement to residue. Her heart begins to sink. She writes a warning letter to Peter indicating she may need

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll