header-logo header-logo

Section 22 & recovery proceedings

21 July 2017 / Kathryn Purkis , Kathryn Purkis
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Kathryn Purkis analyses the limitation periods applicable to claims brought by personal representatives

  • On a proper view, s 22 of the Limitation Act 1980 cannot be used to argue that personal representatives have a special 12-year limitation period within which to sue for mistaken overpayments.

An executrix, Hanna, believes she is dealing with a very large estate, with complex assets. A deserving close family member and residual beneficiary, Peter, asks early on in the administration for a distribution of a sum that appears to the executrix to be a small proportion of his ultimate entitlement under the will. The distribution is readily made out of cash. After a while, however, it begins to become apparent to Hanna that all is not well with the testator’s investments: they include a going concern which carries significant liabilities. Worse, there are some very large specific legacies, the payment of which will take priority over any entitlement to residue. Her heart begins to sink. She writes a warning letter to Peter indicating she may need

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll