header-logo header-logo

Security alert

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Chris Warren-Smith and Ian Pegram advise on what to include in security for costs applications

An application for security for costs has proved an effective strategic weapon for defendants to pursue and fund a defence. Defendants can also use an application to force claimants to re-focus on whether their claim in fact has merit.

However, although the regime certainly applies to costs properly incurred after proceedings have started, the scope of pre-action costs which may validly be included in an application has not been so clear. Helpfully, the court in Lobster Group Ltd v Heidelberg Graphic Equipment Ltd & Anor [2008] All ER (D) 88 (Mar), has now given guidance on the extent to which an applicant might obtain security in respect of preaction costs and the costs of pre-action mediation.

Security for costs
The court’s power to make an order for security for costs is discretionary under CPR Pt 25. The court must be satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, that it is just to make an order and where one or more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Chronic delays, duplication of work, cancelled hearings and inefficiencies in the family law courts are letting children and victims of domestic abuse down, a Public Accounts Committee (PAC) inquiry has found
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
back-to-top-scroll