header-logo header-logo

Security alert

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Chris Warren-Smith and Ian Pegram advise on what to include in security for costs applications

An application for security for costs has proved an effective strategic weapon for defendants to pursue and fund a defence. Defendants can also use an application to force claimants to re-focus on whether their claim in fact has merit.

However, although the regime certainly applies to costs properly incurred after proceedings have started, the scope of pre-action costs which may validly be included in an application has not been so clear. Helpfully, the court in Lobster Group Ltd v Heidelberg Graphic Equipment Ltd & Anor [2008] All ER (D) 88 (Mar), has now given guidance on the extent to which an applicant might obtain security in respect of preaction costs and the costs of pre-action mediation.

Security for costs
The court’s power to make an order for security for costs is discretionary under CPR Pt 25. The court must be satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, that it is just to make an order and where one or more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll