header-logo header-logo

Security alert

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Chris Warren-Smith and Ian Pegram advise on what to include in security for costs applications

An application for security for costs has proved an effective strategic weapon for defendants to pursue and fund a defence. Defendants can also use an application to force claimants to re-focus on whether their claim in fact has merit.

However, although the regime certainly applies to costs properly incurred after proceedings have started, the scope of pre-action costs which may validly be included in an application has not been so clear. Helpfully, the court in Lobster Group Ltd v Heidelberg Graphic Equipment Ltd & Anor [2008] All ER (D) 88 (Mar), has now given guidance on the extent to which an applicant might obtain security in respect of preaction costs and the costs of pre-action mediation.

Security for costs
The court’s power to make an order for security for costs is discretionary under CPR Pt 25. The court must be satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, that it is just to make an order and where one or more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll