header-logo header-logo

Divorce advice: see you out of court!

29 March 2024 / Joanna Newton
Issue: 8065 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family , Divorce , Mediation
printer mail-detail
166021
More separating couples are choosing less adversarial divorce processes. Joanna Newton provides an Easter refresher course on the options available
  • Discusses the options available to divorcing couples when it comes to resolving disputes, including FDR, as well as non-court-based options such as private FDR, mediation, collaborative divorce and arbitration.

Court-based financial dispute resolution (FDR) hearings have always been a useful tool in settling financial disputes without the need for a final court hearing. It is up to the judge on the day to make a decision as to how a separating couple’s finances will be divided.

Gradually, over the past few years—and particularly in the wake of no-fault divorce—more couples are seeking resolution to their financial settlement through less adversarial methods. Options include mediation, arbitration and private FDRs. Family lawyers are seeing a marked reduction in the number of couples going to final hearing, instead choosing more cost-effective, less acrimonious routes to getting a consent order in place. In 2018, 14% of finance cases went

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll