header-logo header-logo

20 January 2011 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Features , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Seeking certainty

Geraldine Morris assesses the latest consultation on nuptial agreements

The Law Commission (the Commission) has issued its eagerly awaited Consultation Paper entitled Marital Property Agreements (Law Com 198) in relation to pre-nuptial, post-nuptial and separation agreements.

Current law

It was anticipated that the Commission would await the decision of the Supreme Court in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42. That case has been widely, and wrongly, viewed as authority for the general enforceability of pre-nuptial agreements; in fact it is authority for an agreement to be upheld where the court considers that the agreement satisfies a test of “fairness” within the context of the factors set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25.

The decision in Radmacher did give considerable weight to the agreement entered into by the parties however, and Lord Philips stated: “The court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll