header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

SENTENCING

R v Reynolds [2007] EWCA Crim 538, [2007] All ER (D) 139 (Mar)

The Court of Appeal summarised the dangerous offender provisions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003):

(i) The first question is whether the offence is a specified offence; the second is whether it is a serious offence.

(ii) If it is a specified offence, whether serious or not, the court must determine whether the defendant meets the criteria of
dangerousness.

(iii) If the criteria of dangerousness are met and the defendant is aged 18 or over:

(a) where the offence is a serious offence, he must be sentenced to an indeterminate sentence under s 225; or
(b) otherwise he must be sentenced to an extended sentence under s 227.
(iv) If the criteria of dangerousness are met, and the offender is under 18:
(a) if the offence is a serious offence and an offence to which he would be liable to a sentence of detention for life under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (PCC(S)A 2000),
s 91, and it justifies—together with any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll