header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025 / Rona Epstein
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Rule of law , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Sentencing women—why it’s time to take a different tack

214626
A prison sentence is devastating for mother & child, writes Rona Epstein
  • The Sentencing Council has issued new guidelines for sentencing pregnant women and mothers of young children.
  • The guidelines would advise courts to protect pregnant women from custody—pre-sentence reports are needed before sentencing a pregnant woman.

On 5 March 2025, the Sentencing Council announced far-reaching reforms of the sentencing regime regarding pregnant women and mothers of young children. The new guidance, ‘Imposition of community and custodial sentences’, had been due to come into force on 1 April 2025, but it has now been suspended, following an intervention by the Justice Secretary. Progressive reform is still possible, we wait to see what ensues.

The new guidance

Had it come into force, the guidance would have included the following direction for sentencers:

  • Sentencing should not go ahead without a comprehensive pre-sentence report. The court should normally adjourn the case for a pre-sentence report before sentencing a mother with dependent children or a pregnant
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll