header-logo header-logo

Sentencing women—why it’s time to take a different tack

04 April 2025 / Rona Epstein
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Rule of law , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
214626
A prison sentence is devastating for mother & child, writes Rona Epstein
  • The Sentencing Council has issued new guidelines for sentencing pregnant women and mothers of young children.
  • The guidelines would advise courts to protect pregnant women from custody—pre-sentence reports are needed before sentencing a pregnant woman.

On 5 March 2025, the Sentencing Council announced far-reaching reforms of the sentencing regime regarding pregnant women and mothers of young children. The new guidance, ‘Imposition of community and custodial sentences’, had been due to come into force on 1 April 2025, but it has now been suspended, following an intervention by the Justice Secretary. Progressive reform is still possible, we wait to see what ensues.

The new guidance

Had it come into force, the guidance would have included the following direction for sentencers:

  • Sentencing should not go ahead without a comprehensive pre-sentence report. The court should normally adjourn the case for a pre-sentence report before sentencing a mother with dependent children or a pregnant or
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll