header-logo header-logo

04 April 2025 / Rona Epstein
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Rule of law , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Sentencing women—why it’s time to take a different tack

214626
A prison sentence is devastating for mother & child, writes Rona Epstein
  • The Sentencing Council has issued new guidelines for sentencing pregnant women and mothers of young children.
  • The guidelines would advise courts to protect pregnant women from custody—pre-sentence reports are needed before sentencing a pregnant woman.

On 5 March 2025, the Sentencing Council announced far-reaching reforms of the sentencing regime regarding pregnant women and mothers of young children. The new guidance, ‘Imposition of community and custodial sentences’, had been due to come into force on 1 April 2025, but it has now been suspended, following an intervention by the Justice Secretary. Progressive reform is still possible, we wait to see what ensues.

The new guidance

Had it come into force, the guidance would have included the following direction for sentencers:

  • Sentencing should not go ahead without a comprehensive pre-sentence report. The court should normally adjourn the case for a pre-sentence report before sentencing a mother with dependent children or a pregnant
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll