header-logo header-logo

05 January 2018 / Julian Savulescu , Charles Foster
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Separated at birth?

nlj_7775_foster

Should pregnant mothers owe a duty to their unborn children? Charles Foster & Julian Savulescu review the legal & ethical issues

  • The autonomy rights of pregnant mothers are hugely important, but should not always prevail over the rights of future children not to be injured by the acts or defaults of their mothers
  • Legislation is needed to correct the imbalance between these rights

Suppose that a woman is pregnant. She drinks a lot of alcohol, knowing that it is likely to harm her foetus. Can or should the law do anything—either during or after the pregnancy?

The mother’s position

ECHR arguments

The woman has, prima facie, a right to do what she wants with her own body. That is a right enshrined in that most elastic of the Articles of the ECHR: Article 8. Article 8 is, of course, not an absolute right: the right conferred by Article 8(1) is subject to the wider societal considerations of 8(2), the provisions of which read: ‘There shall be no interference

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll