header-logo header-logo

05 January 2018 / Julian Savulescu , Charles Foster
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Separated at birth?

nlj_7775_foster

Should pregnant mothers owe a duty to their unborn children? Charles Foster & Julian Savulescu review the legal & ethical issues

  • The autonomy rights of pregnant mothers are hugely important, but should not always prevail over the rights of future children not to be injured by the acts or defaults of their mothers
  • Legislation is needed to correct the imbalance between these rights

Suppose that a woman is pregnant. She drinks a lot of alcohol, knowing that it is likely to harm her foetus. Can or should the law do anything—either during or after the pregnancy?

The mother’s position

ECHR arguments

The woman has, prima facie, a right to do what she wants with her own body. That is a right enshrined in that most elastic of the Articles of the ECHR: Article 8. Article 8 is, of course, not an absolute right: the right conferred by Article 8(1) is subject to the wider societal considerations of 8(2), the provisions of which read: ‘There shall be no interference

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll