header-logo header-logo

17 February 2011 / Catherine Urquhart , Simon Butler
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Serving up trouble

neg_4

Simon Butler & Catherine Urquhart report on a novel duty of care

The Met Bar at the Metropolitan Hotel in London’s Park Lane has long been known for attracting celebrity guests, such as supermodel Kate Moss, premier league footballers and soap opera stars. But to lawyers it may now become better known for its role in the creation of that rare beast, a novel duty of care, following the ruling handed down by the Court of Appeal last month in Everett & Anr v Comojo (UK) Ltd t/a The Metropolitan & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 13, [2011] All ER (D) 106 (Jan).

Damage limitation

In essence this ruling holds that, in certain circumstances, the managers of licensed premises may be liable to their customers for the violent actions of third parties on those premises. Each case will, inevitably, turn on its facts, but it will be a foolish bar manager who does not now ensure that staff are trained to watch out for, and are prepared to deal with, the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll