header-logo header-logo

26 April 2016
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Setfords Solicitors

Dispersed law firm opens London office

Dispersed law firm Setfords Solicitors has opened offices in central London as it continues its expansion into the corporate and commercial market and goes on a recruitment drive. 

The consultant-led-firm, which has 158 lawyers across the country, has opened offices on Chancery Lane under the name Setfords London and is looking to recruit 20 corporate and commercial lawyers by November, the company’s 10-year anniversary.

Setfords was founded in Guildford in 2006 by Guy Setford as a traditional firm, going on to incorporate the dispersed model in 2009 when he was joined by his cousin Chris Setford. As joint CEOs they were one of the pioneers of the national dispersed law firm model. The company has more than doubled its turnover in the past three years, with over £8m forecast for this financial year, and the firm has seen a spike in new corporate and commercial business since January. 

Chris says: “The launch of a London office was always part of Setfords' long term plan and with our corporate and commercial lawyers taking on new business and our plans for further growth, 2016 is the right time to open.

“We are currently in discussions with a significant number of lawyers in the corporate and commercial sectors who have approached us about working as consultants—people who want to be empowered and earn more money, but also feel secure knowing they will have the support they need.”

Guy adds: “We have spent nearly 10 years refining our back-office operation and we are confident we have the largest and best consultant lawyer support team in the industry. It means we are able to provide an environment where great lawyers can come together to deliver their best work.”

The consultant model has been growing in popularity in recent years and Guy says Setfords’ approach is about giving lawyers back control.

He adds: “We want our lawyers to be in charge of their own future and be able to provide a better, more personal service for their clients.”

Chris says: “We set out to create a law firm that focuses on the many needs of lawyers who want a way of working that can be more fulfilling – a dynamic and flexible environment where they can be better rewarded and their clients better served. That is what we have achieved and we will continue to evolve.”

Nominations for the Halsbury Legal Awards 2016, in association with NLJ, are now open. Visit the site to view all the categories and enter online. #Halsbury2016

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll