header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Public , Environment
printer mail-detail

Setting a trap for fly-tippers

147358
Neil Parpworth looks into Sentencing Council proposals to give litterbugs a taste of their own medicine
  • The Sentencing Council is consulting on proposals to increase community orders for fly-tipping and other environmental offences, for example, ordering offenders to clear up rubbish.

As the National Audit Office has noted, ‘the term fly-tipping has no legal significance but is used widely to describe the illegal dumping of waste without the landowners’ permission, or on public land, for example by the roadside’: see ‘Environment Agency—protecting the public from waste’, HC 156 Session 2002-2003 (18 December 2002), para 2.7. As such, it amounts to a specific form of anti-social behaviour which blights urban and rural areas alike. On 7 September 2023 the Sentencing Council published a consultation document entitled ‘Miscellaneous amendments to sentencing guidelines’. Among its pages is a section on a proposed revision to the guidelines on the sentencing of individuals for environmental offences such as fly-tipping.

The consultation

Prior to setting out what is proposed, it is first worth noting a matter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll