header-logo header-logo

Setting off for insolvency

25 November 2016 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail
nlj_7724_duncan

Swap mis-selling & insolvent claimants: Simon Duncan examines the Global Restructuring Group & insolvency set-off

  • More claims centred on GRG’s alleged activities are likely.
  • Insolvency set-off protects the banks’ position.

The banking crisis in 2008 has led to many claims being pursued against banks for the “mis-selling” of interest rate hedging products, frequently interest rate swaps. The claimants are companies that were persuaded to enter into these transactions. Frequently, having swapped a floating rate of interest for a high fixed rate of interest, those companies have been forced into liquidation. They could not afford to maintain the payments to the bank as interest rates have plummeted and remain at very low levels. A redress scheme was introduced under the auspices of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in 2013 to compensate those found to have been “mis-sold” an interest rate hedging product. The FCA estimates that there are 2,000 insolvent estates with “mis-selling” claims.

RBS Plc & the GRG

Some companies complain of having seen their banking relationship transferred to the Global Restructuring Group

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll