header-logo header-logo

Settlement procedure for cartel cases adopted

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-detail

Legal news

A new settlement procedure for cartel cases has been introduced by the European Commission. Under the new regime, the parties in a cartel investigation may acknowledge their breach of European antitrust law and waive certain procedural rights in exchange for a 10% reduction of the fine.

The procedure involves an abbreviated investigation with respect to those parties who are willing to settle. The Commission retains full discretion to determine whether a case is suitable for settlement, whether the evidence available with respect to a party is adequate for these purposes and whether the scope of a settlement is appropriate.

Linklaters partner Jonas Koponen says it could shorten cartel proceedings and reduce the number and scope of appeals brought against Commission decisions. He adds, however: “The procedure will only be a success if the Commission uses its substantial discretion transparently and consistently. The procedure must offer companies strong incentives to settle. In some cases and for some companies, a fine reduction of 10% may be sufficient, but it is far from certain that this will generally be the case.” Koponen says that although, in recent years, the number of cartel decisions has increased, the Commission’s resources are strained by a backlog of cases. By introducing a settlement process, he says, the Commission hopes to speed up that process and to free up resources that can be used to take on the backlog and new cases.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll