header-logo header-logo

Settlement procedure for cartel cases adopted

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-detail

Legal news

A new settlement procedure for cartel cases has been introduced by the European Commission. Under the new regime, the parties in a cartel investigation may acknowledge their breach of European antitrust law and waive certain procedural rights in exchange for a 10% reduction of the fine.

The procedure involves an abbreviated investigation with respect to those parties who are willing to settle. The Commission retains full discretion to determine whether a case is suitable for settlement, whether the evidence available with respect to a party is adequate for these purposes and whether the scope of a settlement is appropriate.

Linklaters partner Jonas Koponen says it could shorten cartel proceedings and reduce the number and scope of appeals brought against Commission decisions. He adds, however: “The procedure will only be a success if the Commission uses its substantial discretion transparently and consistently. The procedure must offer companies strong incentives to settle. In some cases and for some companies, a fine reduction of 10% may be sufficient, but it is far from certain that this will generally be the case.” Koponen says that although, in recent years, the number of cartel decisions has increased, the Commission’s resources are strained by a backlog of cases. By introducing a settlement process, he says, the Commission hopes to speed up that process and to free up resources that can be used to take on the backlog and new cases.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll