header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-detail

Settlement procedure for cartel cases adopted

Legal news

A new settlement procedure for cartel cases has been introduced by the European Commission. Under the new regime, the parties in a cartel investigation may acknowledge their breach of European antitrust law and waive certain procedural rights in exchange for a 10% reduction of the fine.

The procedure involves an abbreviated investigation with respect to those parties who are willing to settle. The Commission retains full discretion to determine whether a case is suitable for settlement, whether the evidence available with respect to a party is adequate for these purposes and whether the scope of a settlement is appropriate.

Linklaters partner Jonas Koponen says it could shorten cartel proceedings and reduce the number and scope of appeals brought against Commission decisions. He adds, however: “The procedure will only be a success if the Commission uses its substantial discretion transparently and consistently. The procedure must offer companies strong incentives to settle. In some cases and for some companies, a fine reduction of 10% may be sufficient, but it is far from certain that this will generally be the case.” Koponen says that although, in recent years, the number of cartel decisions has increased, the Commission’s resources are strained by a backlog of cases. By introducing a settlement process, he says, the Commission hopes to speed up that process and to free up resources that can be used to take on the backlog and new cases.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll