header-logo header-logo

SFO inspection highlights problems

14 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Delays to cases at the beleaguered Serious Fraud Office (SFO) often occur due to staffing and resourcing issues, inspectors have found.

A key reason for the delay is the backlog of digital material waiting to be processed, according to a report published last week by Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI). The report, ‘Case progression in the SFO’, follows six cases in depth. It notes that a case can ‘involve terabytes of data, all of which has to be analysed and dealt with in accordance with the laws relating to privilege, disclosure and data protection that apply to all criminal cases’. Progress can also be held up where there is an international element, requiring the co-operation of another country’s legal system.

However, the report notes that the SFO has been proactive in dealing with staff shortages by providing training and development to upskill staff. For example, the SFO has trained more staff to become investigators and accountants, both disciplines where there were shortages.

In recent years, the SFO has suffered a number of high-profile setbacks, including the failure of a fraud case against two Tesco executives in 2018 and the collapsed trial of five brokers for LIBOR rigging in 2016. In February, it dropped two long-running and expensive investigations into Rolls-Royce and GlaxoSmithKline.

The inspectors recommended that more be done to ensure the timely progression of cases, but recognised the SFO has implemented some changes, including the development of a new case management system and more effective case management controls.

HM Chief Inspector Kevin McGinty said: ‘It would be wrong to read this report negatively and from the view that the SFO is ineffective: it is not. Getting staff to comply with process and be consistent, for line management to be more effective and for there to be better and more effective quality control will go a long way to tackle the recommendations set out in this report.’

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll