header-logo header-logo

14 October 2019
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-detail

SFO inspection highlights problems

Delays to cases at the beleaguered Serious Fraud Office (SFO) often occur due to staffing and resourcing issues, inspectors have found.

A key reason for the delay is the backlog of digital material waiting to be processed, according to a report published last week by Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI). The report, ‘Case progression in the SFO’, follows six cases in depth. It notes that a case can ‘involve terabytes of data, all of which has to be analysed and dealt with in accordance with the laws relating to privilege, disclosure and data protection that apply to all criminal cases’. Progress can also be held up where there is an international element, requiring the co-operation of another country’s legal system.

However, the report notes that the SFO has been proactive in dealing with staff shortages by providing training and development to upskill staff. For example, the SFO has trained more staff to become investigators and accountants, both disciplines where there were shortages.

In recent years, the SFO has suffered a number of high-profile setbacks, including the failure of a fraud case against two Tesco executives in 2018 and the collapsed trial of five brokers for LIBOR rigging in 2016. In February, it dropped two long-running and expensive investigations into Rolls-Royce and GlaxoSmithKline.

The inspectors recommended that more be done to ensure the timely progression of cases, but recognised the SFO has implemented some changes, including the development of a new case management system and more effective case management controls.

HM Chief Inspector Kevin McGinty said: ‘It would be wrong to read this report negatively and from the view that the SFO is ineffective: it is not. Getting staff to comply with process and be consistent, for line management to be more effective and for there to be better and more effective quality control will go a long way to tackle the recommendations set out in this report.’

Issue: 7859 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll