header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Shades of grey

istock_000003104233medium

Martin Burns offers a guide to identifying conflicts of interest in dispute resolution

When RICS appoints a third party to resolve a dispute we must take care to ensure the appointee is appropriately qualified to discharge the role, and has no conflicts of interest. But how do we decide if someone is conflicted?

Black v white

Life would be much easier if we had a list of every possible situation that could arise and labelled each as either “black” to indicate something is a conflict, or “white” to indicate it is not.

Those who like to keep things simple may be heartened to learn that I actually believe the subject of conflicts is indeed about black and white situations. Less pleasing perhaps is the reality that black and white situations are tiny in number when compared to those that are shades of grey.

For me, black indicates a tiny number of situations where it is obvious and undeniable that a conflict exists, and anyone would recognise this. White represents a tiny number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll