header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Shades of grey

istock_000003104233medium

Martin Burns offers a guide to identifying conflicts of interest in dispute resolution

When RICS appoints a third party to resolve a dispute we must take care to ensure the appointee is appropriately qualified to discharge the role, and has no conflicts of interest. But how do we decide if someone is conflicted?

Black v white

Life would be much easier if we had a list of every possible situation that could arise and labelled each as either “black” to indicate something is a conflict, or “white” to indicate it is not.

Those who like to keep things simple may be heartened to learn that I actually believe the subject of conflicts is indeed about black and white situations. Less pleasing perhaps is the reality that black and white situations are tiny in number when compared to those that are shades of grey.

For me, black indicates a tiny number of situations where it is obvious and undeniable that a conflict exists, and anyone would recognise this. White represents a tiny number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll