header-logo header-logo

06 November 2009 / Timothy Pitt-payne
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The shadow of the past

Employment vetting law has been rewritten, says Timothy Pitt-Payne

In 2004, a woman was employed by an employment agency that provided staff for schools. She worked as a playground assistant, supervising children during their lunchtime break. Her employer carried out a check with the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB).

The CRB check did not show any criminal convictions; but it disclosed that the applicant’s son had previously been placed on the child protection register on grounds of neglect, and that he had been removed from the register after being convicted of robbery and given a custodial sentence. Soon afterwards she was told by the agency that it no longer required her services.

So far there is nothing unusual about this story. CRB checks are an increasingly common feature of working life. Some CRB disclosures (known as standard disclosures) are confined to information about past convictions held on the Police National Computer (PNC), including convictions that have become spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974.

Other disclosures—known as enhanced disclosures—may, in addition,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll