header-logo header-logo

06 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Full-service law firm Shakespeare Martineau has appointed Jonathan Warren as a partner in its London real estate disputes team. He joins from Teacher Stern, where he was joint head of the real estate disputes department, bringing more than 17 years’ experience in property litigation gained at Finers Stephens Innocent (now Howard Kennedy), Mishcon de Reya, and as in-house counsel at a major residential property management company.

A highly regarded property litigator, Warren advises on the full range of real estate disputes, landlord and tenant matters, risk analysis, and alternative dispute resolution. In recent years, he has led some of the first remediation contribution order and building liability order claims arising from the Building Safety Act. In his new role, he will focus on expanding the firm’s London disputes capability and supporting complex litigation cases.

‘I’m thrilled to be joining Shakespeare Martineau and contributing to the growth of the London office,’ said Warren. ‘The opportunity to help develop our real estate disputes offering and work with a talented, forward-looking team is incredibly exciting.’ He added that he looks forward to ‘helping clients achieve creative, effective solutions to complex problems while supporting the next generation of lawyers’.

Victoria Tester, managing director at the firm, said: ‘Jonathan is a highly skilled and trusted litigator with deep experience in complex property disputes. His commercial insight, technical expertise and track record of delivering results for clients make him a fantastic addition to the team.’ She noted that his arrival ‘strengthens our London real estate disputes capability and aligns with our strategy to provide innovative, client-focused solutions’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll