header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Margaret Hatwood
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Family
printer mail-detail

A share of the silver spoon

Can inherited wealth be claimed by a non-inheriting spouse when a couple split up? Margaret Hatwood investigates

It is not unusual for clients to be anxious about whether their spouse will be able to claim a share of any inheritance. Whether or not a non-inheriting party may expect to benefit from an inherited asset will be considered in three specific stages, depending upon when the inheritance was received namely:

  • prior to the marriage;
  • during the marriage; and
  • post-separation/ divorce.

Statutory framework

Unfortunately, s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) does not refer to inheritances. Inheritances are, however, relevant and are considered by the court under s 25(2)(a) as “financial resources which each of the parties has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future”. In the writer’s experience, “has” is not such a problem. At least one can generally quantify the inheritance. However, “likely to have in the foreseeable future” is where the problems really start.

The starting point is the case of White v White

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll