header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014 / Margaret Hatwood
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Family
printer mail-detail

A share of the silver spoon

Can inherited wealth be claimed by a non-inheriting spouse when a couple split up? Margaret Hatwood investigates

It is not unusual for clients to be anxious about whether their spouse will be able to claim a share of any inheritance. Whether or not a non-inheriting party may expect to benefit from an inherited asset will be considered in three specific stages, depending upon when the inheritance was received namely:

  • prior to the marriage;
  • during the marriage; and
  • post-separation/ divorce.

Statutory framework

Unfortunately, s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) does not refer to inheritances. Inheritances are, however, relevant and are considered by the court under s 25(2)(a) as “financial resources which each of the parties has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future”. In the writer’s experience, “has” is not such a problem. At least one can generally quantify the inheritance. However, “likely to have in the foreseeable future” is where the problems really start.

The starting point is the case of White v White

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll