header-logo header-logo

A share of the silver spoon

20 June 2014 / Margaret Hatwood
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Family
printer mail-detail

Can inherited wealth be claimed by a non-inheriting spouse when a couple split up? Margaret Hatwood investigates

It is not unusual for clients to be anxious about whether their spouse will be able to claim a share of any inheritance. Whether or not a non-inheriting party may expect to benefit from an inherited asset will be considered in three specific stages, depending upon when the inheritance was received namely:

  • prior to the marriage;
  • during the marriage; and
  • post-separation/ divorce.

Statutory framework

Unfortunately, s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) does not refer to inheritances. Inheritances are, however, relevant and are considered by the court under s 25(2)(a) as “financial resources which each of the parties has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future”. In the writer’s experience, “has” is not such a problem. At least one can generally quantify the inheritance. However, “likely to have in the foreseeable future” is where the problems really start.

The starting point is the case of White v White

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll