header-logo header-logo

At the sharp end

28 March 2013 / Cara Nuttall
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Many solicitors are anticipating the legal aid cuts with an increasing sense of doom, says Cara Nuttall

In the family law field, the government is hoping for a migration to mediation. This suggestion is optimistic. I doubt it emanated from someone with significant experience of family law, and the effect a family breakdown can have upon reason and emotions, especially if unchecked by an impartial advisor.

There are, of course, cases which are ripe for mediation. Far more common are cases which will eventually be appropriate for mediation, but only once expectations and emotions have first been managed through legal advice.

Family law is a topic about which there is untold confusion, myths and half-truths among the public. Huge numbers of litigants appear hopelessly misinformed as to their rights and responsibilities. Many clients need support, reassurance and encouragement to pursue even their most basic entitlements. Others, of course, need talking down from the ceiling. Without a realistic and accurate understanding of their position and options, there is widespread concern about the extent to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll