header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013 / Cara Nuttall
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

At the sharp end

Many solicitors are anticipating the legal aid cuts with an increasing sense of doom, says Cara Nuttall

In the family law field, the government is hoping for a migration to mediation. This suggestion is optimistic. I doubt it emanated from someone with significant experience of family law, and the effect a family breakdown can have upon reason and emotions, especially if unchecked by an impartial advisor.

There are, of course, cases which are ripe for mediation. Far more common are cases which will eventually be appropriate for mediation, but only once expectations and emotions have first been managed through legal advice.

Family law is a topic about which there is untold confusion, myths and half-truths among the public. Huge numbers of litigants appear hopelessly misinformed as to their rights and responsibilities. Many clients need support, reassurance and encouragement to pursue even their most basic entitlements. Others, of course, need talking down from the ceiling. Without a realistic and accurate understanding of their position and options, there is widespread concern about the extent to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll