header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , ADR , Mediation , Profession
printer mail-detail

Without prejudice: Shedding new light

27520
Bryan Clark sets the record straight on recent developments in without prejudice rules in mediation
  • Berkeley Square Holdings and others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch): shedding significant new light on some of the exceptions to the without prejudice rule.


Confidentiality is one of the most vaunted attributes of mediation. One important benefit of this is the ability of parties to speak freely in their negotiation safe in the knowledge that what happens in the mediation, stays in the mediation. In particular, mediators often assure parties that matters disclosed by parties in the heat of the battle cannot be led in evidence in any consequent litigation. But the issue is not so clear cut. There is no absolute bar on evidential disclosure as to what took place in the mediation. No special mediation privilege exists in England and Wales and no bespoke statutory provisions governing confidentiality in mediation exist (except in EU cross border matters under the Cross Border Mediation (EU Directive)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll