header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , ADR , Mediation , Profession
printer mail-detail

Without prejudice: Shedding new light

27520
Bryan Clark sets the record straight on recent developments in without prejudice rules in mediation
  • Berkeley Square Holdings and others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch): shedding significant new light on some of the exceptions to the without prejudice rule.


Confidentiality is one of the most vaunted attributes of mediation. One important benefit of this is the ability of parties to speak freely in their negotiation safe in the knowledge that what happens in the mediation, stays in the mediation. In particular, mediators often assure parties that matters disclosed by parties in the heat of the battle cannot be led in evidence in any consequent litigation. But the issue is not so clear cut. There is no absolute bar on evidential disclosure as to what took place in the mediation. No special mediation privilege exists in England and Wales and no bespoke statutory provisions governing confidentiality in mediation exist (except in EU cross border matters under the Cross Border Mediation (EU Directive)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll