header-logo header-logo

Without prejudice: Shedding new light

16 September 2020 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , ADR , Mediation , Profession
printer mail-detail
27520
Bryan Clark sets the record straight on recent developments in without prejudice rules in mediation
  • Berkeley Square Holdings and others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch): shedding significant new light on some of the exceptions to the without prejudice rule.


Confidentiality is one of the most vaunted attributes of mediation. One important benefit of this is the ability of parties to speak freely in their negotiation safe in the knowledge that what happens in the mediation, stays in the mediation. In particular, mediators often assure parties that matters disclosed by parties in the heat of the battle cannot be led in evidence in any consequent litigation. But the issue is not so clear cut. There is no absolute bar on evidential disclosure as to what took place in the mediation. No special mediation privilege exists in England and Wales and no bespoke statutory provisions governing confidentiality in mediation exist (except in EU cross border matters under the Cross Border Mediation (EU Directive)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll