header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , ADR , Mediation , Profession
printer mail-detail

Without prejudice: Shedding new light

27520
Bryan Clark sets the record straight on recent developments in without prejudice rules in mediation
  • Berkeley Square Holdings and others v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1015 (Ch): shedding significant new light on some of the exceptions to the without prejudice rule.


Confidentiality is one of the most vaunted attributes of mediation. One important benefit of this is the ability of parties to speak freely in their negotiation safe in the knowledge that what happens in the mediation, stays in the mediation. In particular, mediators often assure parties that matters disclosed by parties in the heat of the battle cannot be led in evidence in any consequent litigation. But the issue is not so clear cut. There is no absolute bar on evidential disclosure as to what took place in the mediation. No special mediation privilege exists in England and Wales and no bespoke statutory provisions governing confidentiality in mediation exist (except in EU cross border matters under the Cross Border Mediation (EU Directive)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll