header-logo header-logo

Shell drops jurisdictional arguments

13 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , International justice
printer mail-detail
A major trial concerning liability for oil pollution in the Niger Delta is to go ahead in the High Court after Royal Dutch Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary SPDC confirmed it would not contest jurisdictional issues

The trial, Okpabi v Shell, is likely to be heard next year and to lead to the disclosure of internal Shell documents about its environmental practices in Nigeria, according to Leigh Day, the law firm representing members of the Ogale and Bille communities. The communities, comprising more than 50,000 people, allege Royal Dutch Shell and SPDC are jointly responsible for the oil pollution that has afflicted their land for decades. They are seeking clean-up and reparations for the damage.

In February, the Supreme Court held in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell [2021] UKSC 3 that Royal Dutch Shell was arguably liable for the pollution, which resulted from failings in SPDC’s operations, and the case could proceed in the English courts. Some remaining questions as to whether SPDC could be joined to the claims were sent to the High Court for determination. However, Shell’s confirmation that it will not contest these means the trial will go ahead, with SPDC joined.

Shell had not denied both communities were severely polluted by its oil or that no adequate clean-up had taken place. However, it had argued it could not be legally responsible for the harm and so the cases should not be heard in England.

Leigh Day partner Daniel Leader said: ‘This is a significant win for the communities.

‘After five years of legal arguments at the High Court, Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, the Communities claims can finally progress toward a trial. In the meantime, Shell’s oil contamination remains in their drinking water, land and waterways and still no clean-up has taken place.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll