header-logo header-logo

Shell drops jurisdictional arguments

13 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , International justice
printer mail-detail
A major trial concerning liability for oil pollution in the Niger Delta is to go ahead in the High Court after Royal Dutch Shell and its Nigerian subsidiary SPDC confirmed it would not contest jurisdictional issues

The trial, Okpabi v Shell, is likely to be heard next year and to lead to the disclosure of internal Shell documents about its environmental practices in Nigeria, according to Leigh Day, the law firm representing members of the Ogale and Bille communities. The communities, comprising more than 50,000 people, allege Royal Dutch Shell and SPDC are jointly responsible for the oil pollution that has afflicted their land for decades. They are seeking clean-up and reparations for the damage.

In February, the Supreme Court held in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell [2021] UKSC 3 that Royal Dutch Shell was arguably liable for the pollution, which resulted from failings in SPDC’s operations, and the case could proceed in the English courts. Some remaining questions as to whether SPDC could be joined to the claims were sent to the High Court for determination. However, Shell’s confirmation that it will not contest these means the trial will go ahead, with SPDC joined.

Shell had not denied both communities were severely polluted by its oil or that no adequate clean-up had taken place. However, it had argued it could not be legally responsible for the harm and so the cases should not be heard in England.

Leigh Day partner Daniel Leader said: ‘This is a significant win for the communities.

‘After five years of legal arguments at the High Court, Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, the Communities claims can finally progress toward a trial. In the meantime, Shell’s oil contamination remains in their drinking water, land and waterways and still no clean-up has taken place.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll