header-logo header-logo

Shipping

20 November 2014
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Standard Chartered Bank v Dorchester LNG (2) Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1382, [2014] All ER (D) 273 (Oct)

SG made an unconditional tender of the bill of lading to the claimant bank on G’s behalf, but the claimant had declined to accept it. The claimant refused to make payment under the letter of credit and G commenced proceedings. The claimant then paid the full amount of the face value of the letter of credit. It subsequently brought proceedings against the defendant. The judge held that the claimant had become the holder of the bill of lading when it was presented at its counters under the letter of credit, and so had acquired the right to sue on that date, or when it met G’s demands. The defendant appealed. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the defendant’s appeal, held that, although the judge had given a different meaning to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992, s 5(2)(b), he had been right to hold that the claimant had become the holder of the bill of lading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll