header-logo header-logo

06 May 2016
Issue: 7697 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping

Shipowners’ Mutual Protection And Indemnity Association (Luxembourg) v Containerships Denizcilik Nakliyat Ve Ticaret AS [2016] EWCA Civ 386, [2016] All ER (D) 141 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by charterers of a grounded vessel against a judge’s decision granting the insurers of the owner’s vessel an anti-suit injunction to restrain the continuance of proceedings brought in Turkey against the insurer of the vessel (the club) by the charterers. The court considered the juridical nature of a Turkish statute which gave a victim the right to sue a defendant’s insurer directly without first suing the insured. The judge had taken account of all the matters and had concluded that the proceedings in Turkey would be oppressive and vexatious because they would infringe the club’s contractual right, in circumstances where the club’s terms provided for London arbitration and that the club would only be liable if the owner had paid the claims against it. That was not an exercise of discretion which could be faulted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll