header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping

Osmium Shipping Corporation v Cargill International SA [2012] EWHC 571 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 196 (Mar)

Off-hire provisions of a charter did not necessarily, or indeed usually, tie in with the provisions of the charter which related to breach of obligation by one party or the other. Further, standard form charters were often used with a series of add-on special clauses which did not always fit together immaculately. Where there were one or more clauses which dealt with off-hire events, they had to be looked at together and reconciled, but where the charter provided for off-hire in some provisions and charterparty obligations and remedies for breach in others, the focus inevitably had to be on the off-hire clauses when determining whether the off-hire event had occurred.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll