header-logo header-logo

Shipping—Time charterparty—Withdrawal of vessel for non-payment of hire

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] All ER (D) 18 (May)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption SCJJ, 2 May 2012


The Supreme Court considered a clause in a charterparty containing an indemnity from the charterer in favour of the owner against all consequences or liabilities arising from the master complying with the charterer’s instructions.

Andrew Baker QC and Henry Byam-Cook (instructed by Thomas Cooper Solicitors) for the charterer. Timothy Brenton QC (instructed by Ince & Co LLP) for the owner.

In 2006, the claimant ship owner time-chartered its vessel to the defendant charterer for 36 months plus or minus 15 days at charterers’ option. The charterparty was on the Shelltime 3 Form which contained a standard form of withdrawal clause that provided that if hire was not paid when due, the owner would have the right to withdraw the vessel “without prejudice to any claim owners may otherwise have on charterers
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll