header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shipping—Time charterparty—Withdrawal of vessel for non-payment of hire

Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17, [2012] All ER (D) 18 (May)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption SCJJ, 2 May 2012


The Supreme Court considered a clause in a charterparty containing an indemnity from the charterer in favour of the owner against all consequences or liabilities arising from the master complying with the charterer’s instructions.

Andrew Baker QC and Henry Byam-Cook (instructed by Thomas Cooper Solicitors) for the charterer. Timothy Brenton QC (instructed by Ince & Co LLP) for the owner.

In 2006, the claimant ship owner time-chartered its vessel to the defendant charterer for 36 months plus or minus 15 days at charterers’ option. The charterparty was on the Shelltime 3 Form which contained a standard form of withdrawal clause that provided that if hire was not paid when due, the owner would have the right to withdraw the vessel “without prejudice to any claim owners may otherwise have on charterers
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll