header-logo header-logo

Shipwreck treasure for South Africa

15 May 2024
Issue: 8071 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , International
printer mail-detail

A cargo of silver worth more than $43m, sunk off the Seychelles in 1942, belongs to South Africa, the Supreme Court has unanimously held

The SS Tilawa, scuppered by two torpedoes from a Japanese submarine, was carrying 2,364 bars of silver purchased in India by South Africa for minting coinage for South Africa and Egypt. In 2017, the silver was salvaged by Argentum Exploration Ltd and declared to the Receiver of Wreck in Southampton, UK.

Argentum brought a claim for salvage in rem (against the silver) as opposed to in personam (against South Africa, owner of the silver). South Africa sought to strike out Argentum’s claim on the grounds it had immunity under the State Immunity Act 1978.

The case centred on whether the cargo and ship were ‘at the time when the cause of action arose, in use or intended for use for commercial purposes’, under s 10(4)(a) of the 1978 Act. If so, immunity was lost.

In Argentum Exploration v Republic of South Africa [2024] UKSC 16, [2024] All ER (D) 33 (May), the Supreme Court unanimously held South Africa was entitled to immunity from Argentum’s claim. It rejected Argentum’s argument that the cargo was being carried for commercial purposes due to the commercial arrangements in place.

Jonathan Goulding, senior associate, HFW, who was part of the team advising South Africa, said: ‘It is not just the government of South Africa that will be grateful for this landmark and first of its kind ruling.

‘Indeed, governments around the world will be relieved that the court has decided that if the salvaged cargo in question was intended for state use, such as minting currency as in this case, it falls within the remit of state immunity and can be recovered by the state. As we continue to learn more about the ocean seabed, many more historic wrecks have already been targeted by salvors.

‘In light of this ruling, anyone hoping to recover valuable lost cargo, and bring it to the UK to claim ownership of it, will first need to take steps to identify the original owner and make contractual agreements with them to salvage cargo before attempting to do so.’

Issue: 8071 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll