header-logo header-logo

16 December 2011 / Lehna Hewitt , Kim Beatson
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Short but not sweet

Kim Beatson & Lehna Hewitt review the court’s approach to asset sharing & brief encounters

One of the factors under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25, which the court must have regard to when redistributing the assets on divorce, is the age of the parties and the duration of the marriage. What is the court’s approach when the marriage has been short?

The first point to consider is what is meant by a “short marriage”. Although this is a subjective question, it is generally accepted that a short marriage is one which has lasted for around five years or less. Pre-marriage cohabitation will be added to the length of the marriage (see GW v RW [2003] EWHC 611 (Fam), [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May), however, the duration of the marriage cannot be considered in isolation, and there may be a multitude of other relevant factors such as children, contributions, and earning potential. Although the court’s approach to the division of assets in short marriages has evolved in a somewhat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll