header-logo header-logo

Silk’s behaviour ‘unacceptable’

11 December 2024
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
Former chair of the Criminal Bar Association Jo Sidhu KC, who led the 2022 criminal barrister strikes, has been found guilty of professional misconduct by the Bar Tribunals and Adjudication Service panel. 

Three out of 15 allegations were found proven, relating to ‘inappropriate and unwanted’ behaviour when he invited a woman on a mini-pupillage to his hotel room. Allegations concerning a further two young women were either struck out or dismissed.

Bar chair Sam Townend KC said: ‘The type of behaviour described by the tribunal is completely unacceptable at the Bar. Even though the tribunal found some aspects did not constitute professional misconduct, they found the behaviours to be reprehensible.’

Issue: 8098 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll