header-logo header-logo

That sinking feeling

04 April 2012 / Richard Hinton
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Damages , Property
printer mail-detail

The UK may be in deep water as flood insurance ends, says Richard Hinton

June 2013 will see an end to the government's agreement with the Association of British Insurers (ABI) to ensure universal provision of flood insurance. That might seem a long way off, but now is the time for property buyers and their conveyancers to prepare for the possibility there will be no flood insurance provision for millions of UK properties.

Statement of principles

The 2009 incarnation of the statement of principlesî agreement which since 2000 served to ensure all UK properties can be insured against flooding expires on 30 June 2013. No plans have been announced for the agreement to be replaced. This is because the 2009 agreement foresaw no need beyond 2013 for any extension, assuming the governments undertakings for investment in flood defences were fulfilled. British insurers agreed to cover flood damage to properties on the basis that the government would ìreduce the annual probability of flooding each year for a substantial number of properties. It was assumed
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll