header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012 / Richard Hinton
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Damages , Property
printer mail-detail

That sinking feeling

The UK may be in deep water as flood insurance ends, says Richard Hinton

June 2013 will see an end to the government's agreement with the Association of British Insurers (ABI) to ensure universal provision of flood insurance. That might seem a long way off, but now is the time for property buyers and their conveyancers to prepare for the possibility there will be no flood insurance provision for millions of UK properties.

Statement of principles

The 2009 incarnation of the statement of principlesî agreement which since 2000 served to ensure all UK properties can be insured against flooding expires on 30 June 2013. No plans have been announced for the agreement to be replaced. This is because the 2009 agreement foresaw no need beyond 2013 for any extension, assuming the governments undertakings for investment in flood defences were fulfilled. British insurers agreed to cover flood damage to properties on the basis that the government would ìreduce the annual probability of flooding each year for a substantial number of properties. It was
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll