header-logo header-logo

Sir Rupert Jackson: a very civil legacy

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
nlj_7783_comment

Sir Rupert Jackson’s reforms will have a far-reaching impact on the civil justice system for years to come, so what is his legacy, asks Professor Dominic Regan in NLJ this week.

Sir Rupert, who is soon to retire, was in 2009 given the difficult task of coming up with reforms to deliver civil justice at proportionate cost. The result was drastic change introduced on 1 April 2013 ranging from the ‘overriding objective to Pt 36’ to sanctions for procrastinating solicitors to sweeping reforms on costs.

Regan reports that there are two areas where Jackson has been ‘traduced’: the wrongful allegation that the abolition of legal aid was his idea, and the association of his legacy with the ‘dreadful Andrew Mitchell “Plebgate” saga’.

In fact, neither allegations bear out. Regan concludes: ‘Our civil structure has been transformed more by him than anyone else in living memory. That is his legacy.’

Read Dominic's piece in full, 'Jackson LJ: a lasting legacy', here

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll