header-logo header-logo

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Sir Rupert Jackson: a very civil legacy

nlj_7783_comment

Sir Rupert Jackson’s reforms will have a far-reaching impact on the civil justice system for years to come, so what is his legacy, asks Professor Dominic Regan in NLJ this week.

Sir Rupert, who is soon to retire, was in 2009 given the difficult task of coming up with reforms to deliver civil justice at proportionate cost. The result was drastic change introduced on 1 April 2013 ranging from the ‘overriding objective to Pt 36’ to sanctions for procrastinating solicitors to sweeping reforms on costs.

Regan reports that there are two areas where Jackson has been ‘traduced’: the wrongful allegation that the abolition of legal aid was his idea, and the association of his legacy with the ‘dreadful Andrew Mitchell “Plebgate” saga’.

In fact, neither allegations bear out. Regan concludes: ‘Our civil structure has been transformed more by him than anyone else in living memory. That is his legacy.’

Read Dominic's piece in full, 'Jackson LJ: a lasting legacy', here

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll