header-logo header-logo

Six-month employee rights roll out

A flagship employment law reform is due to come into effect on 1 July, extending unfair dismissal rights to employees after six months in their job instead of two years

The increased protection, in force fully from January 2027, is a key plank of the Employment Rights Act 2025.

Charlie Barnes, head of employment legal services at audit and consultancy firm RSM UK, said many businesses may not realise ‘any employees recruited from July 1 this year will be able to claim unfair dismissal after six months of service.

‘We’re recommending businesses get ready for the change by ensuring contractual probationary periods do not exceed five months, that probationary review processes are reinforced, and line managers are retrained on good performance management procedure.’ Barnes said RSM’s own research found 40% of employers anticipate a rise in claims to the employment tribunal.

The Employment Lawyers’ Association has urged the government to provide more support for employment tribunals, where claims typically take five years to reach the hearing stage.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll