header-logo header-logo

11 December 2015 / Kim Harrison , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7680 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Slave to the system

nlj_7680_scorer

Richard Scorer & Kim Harrison explain why anti-slavery legislation needs sharper teeth

It would be nice to think that slavery is a thing of the past but it is not. If slavery is defined to include “slavery, servitude, forced or compulsory labour, human trafficking and exploitation; including the sexual exploitation of both adults and children” (its definition within the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA 2015)) then there are thousands of slaves in the UK—around 13,000 according to the Home Office. It will only be defeated if its victims can hold the perpetrators to account in the courts. But are the legal remedies for modern slavery—particularly civil remedies—as effective as they need to be?

An obvious starting point for legal accountability is the Human Rights Act 1998, which expressly prohibits slavery in Art 4, but this needs to be underpinned by practical enforcement measures. Hence the introduction of MSA 2015, which consolidates and simplifies existing human trafficking and slavery offences and also increases the maximum sentence for slavery and human trafficking to life

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll