header-logo header-logo

11 September 2014
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Slowdown in family courts

Divorce cases are taking 10% longer to complete due to delays caused by the increase in litigants in person.

Figures gathered by law firm Hugh James show a divorce case lasted an average of 23.9 weeks in the first quarter of 2014—two weeks longer than the same quarter in the previous year.

Litigants in person have increased in numbers since the withdrawal of legal aid from family law cases in April 2013 by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment Act 2012 (LASPO).

Charlotte Leyshon, associate at Hugh James, says: “Judges, solicitors, and our clients are growing increasingly frustrated by the length of time cases are taking. More people are trying to represent themselves in court but they lack the experience and technical knowledge of lawyers...Judges are in a difficult position because they want to try and speed cases up but actually have to take more time with people representing themselves.”

Issue: 7621 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll