header-logo header-logo

Small law firms: running for cover?

11 February 2022 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
71848
Are increasing professional indemnity insurance premiums posing a threat to small law firms? Veronica Cowan investigates
  • Reports show that professional indemnity insurance (PII) has increased by an average of 30% among small and medium firms, with the cost of PII identified as one of their biggest threats.
  • The increasing premiums may be fuelling a rise in legal practitioners leaving private practice and becoming consultants for larger firms.

News that law firms have struggled during the COVID pandemic is hardly surprising, given the importance of face-to-face contact for many clients in certain specialities. But physical interaction apart, it seems that a major reason is because they cannot afford the professional indemnity insurance (PII) premiums required by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). This mainly covers civil liability claims, and usually professional negligence, in private legal practice. Since insurance is compulsory, if a lawyer cannot buy it, they cannot be in business. Looking ahead to April 2022, law firms will be assessing their risk and seeking cover for it. 

Minority rule

‘The question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll