header-logo header-logo

11 February 2022 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Small law firms: running for cover?

71848
Are increasing professional indemnity insurance premiums posing a threat to small law firms? Veronica Cowan investigates
  • Reports show that professional indemnity insurance (PII) has increased by an average of 30% among small and medium firms, with the cost of PII identified as one of their biggest threats.
  • The increasing premiums may be fuelling a rise in legal practitioners leaving private practice and becoming consultants for larger firms.

News that law firms have struggled during the COVID pandemic is hardly surprising, given the importance of face-to-face contact for many clients in certain specialities. But physical interaction apart, it seems that a major reason is because they cannot afford the professional indemnity insurance (PII) premiums required by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). This mainly covers civil liability claims, and usually professional negligence, in private legal practice. Since insurance is compulsory, if a lawyer cannot buy it, they cannot be in business. Looking ahead to April 2022, law firms will be assessing their risk and seeking cover for it. 

Minority rule

‘The question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll