header-logo header-logo

Small but perfectly formed

10 February 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Is the small claims court so bad, asks Peter Thompson QC

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a litigant in person must be in want of a lawyer. This seems to be the conclusion of the working group set up by the Civil Justice Council to consider access to justice for litigants in person (November 2011). Its main task was “to consider what steps could be taken to improve access to justice for litigants in person”. Its starting point was that the present civil justice system was “a system of real quality, but one designed for lawyers, and which as a consequence was and is far too complex and obscure for those representing themselves”.

Troublesome system

Features of the civil justice system that must be troublesome for the litigant in person include the presumed mastery of a whole volume of protocols, rules, and practice directions. Even topics that have simple titles like disclosure, offers to settle, and costs turn out to have technical requirements and dire consequences for anyone who does

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll