header-logo header-logo

10 February 2012 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Small but perfectly formed

Is the small claims court so bad, asks Peter Thompson QC

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a litigant in person must be in want of a lawyer. This seems to be the conclusion of the working group set up by the Civil Justice Council to consider access to justice for litigants in person (November 2011). Its main task was “to consider what steps could be taken to improve access to justice for litigants in person”. Its starting point was that the present civil justice system was “a system of real quality, but one designed for lawyers, and which as a consequence was and is far too complex and obscure for those representing themselves”.

Troublesome system

Features of the civil justice system that must be troublesome for the litigant in person include the presumed mastery of a whole volume of protocols, rules, and practice directions. Even topics that have simple titles like disclosure, offers to settle, and costs turn out to have technical requirements and dire consequences for anyone who does

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll