header-logo header-logo

29 November 2021
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Smart contracts are legal & viable, Law Commission confirms

The Law Commission has confirmed that smart legal contracts can be accommodated by existing law, and there is no need for statutory law reform
While some incremental development of the common law may be required in some contexts, the current legal framework is sufficiently robust, the Commission concluded last week. To avoid any potential difficulties, however, it encouraged parties to include express terms such as clauses allocating risk in relation to the performance of the code, and setting out clearly the relationship between any natural language and coded components.

The Law Commission also published a short update paper on its work on cryptoassets and other digital assets. It explains that the Commission’s work will address different sub-categories of digital assets, and will consider whether certain digital assets might be most accurately categorised within a third category of property, distinct from the existing categories of tangible property (things in possession) and intangible property (things in action).

Professor Sarah Green, the Law Commissioner for the Commercial and Common Law Team, said: ‘Smart legal contracts could revolutionise the way we do business, particularly by increasing efficiency and transparency in transactions.

‘We have concluded that the current legal framework is clearly able to facilitate and support the use of smart legal contracts; an important step in ensuring increased recognition and facilitation of these agreements. Our related work on digital assets and conflict of laws will further establish England and Wales as a global leader for technological innovations in the digital sphere.’

A Law Society spokesperson said: ‘It’s a thoughtful analysis of the legal issues relating to digital commerce and makes a key contribution to ensuring the UK remains the best destination for digital business in future.’

 

Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll