header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Alisdair Gillespie
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Child law , Community care
printer mail-detail

Smoke and mirrors

Legislating for Sarah's Law is unnecessary and will not make our children any safer, says Alisdair Gillespie

The tabloid press got excited earlier this month about the fact that “Sarah’s Law” was going to be piloted in certain parts of England and Wales. Although the Home Office quickly announced that it would not be piloted but rather a small number of procedural measures had been discussed which would be piloted over the coming weeks, the intense media pressure demonstrates that Sarah’s Law remains a live political issue.

It was named after the schoolgirl Sarah Payne, who was murdered in 2000 by Roy Whiting, and is intended to be a UK version of “Megan’s Law”—the US system whereby parents are notified of convicted sex offenders in their area. The main force behind Sarah’s Law is the News of the World although it is assisted by other tabloid newspapers and certain pressure groups. Sarah’s Law has never been fully explained in terms of how it will work in practice other than to say it will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll