header-logo header-logo

Smoke and mirrors

27 April 2007 / Alisdair Gillespie
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Child law , Community care
printer mail-detail

Legislating for Sarah's Law is unnecessary and will not make our children any safer, says Alisdair Gillespie

The tabloid press got excited earlier this month about the fact that “Sarah’s Law” was going to be piloted in certain parts of England and Wales. Although the Home Office quickly announced that it would not be piloted but rather a small number of procedural measures had been discussed which would be piloted over the coming weeks, the intense media pressure demonstrates that Sarah’s Law remains a live political issue.

It was named after the schoolgirl Sarah Payne, who was murdered in 2000 by Roy Whiting, and is intended to be a UK version of “Megan’s Law”—the US system whereby parents are notified of convicted sex offenders in their area. The main force behind Sarah’s Law is the News of the World although it is assisted by other tabloid newspapers and certain pressure groups. Sarah’s Law has never been fully explained in terms of how it will work in practice other than to say it will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll