header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Alisdair Gillespie
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Child law , Community care
printer mail-detail

Smoke and mirrors

Legislating for Sarah's Law is unnecessary and will not make our children any safer, says Alisdair Gillespie

The tabloid press got excited earlier this month about the fact that “Sarah’s Law” was going to be piloted in certain parts of England and Wales. Although the Home Office quickly announced that it would not be piloted but rather a small number of procedural measures had been discussed which would be piloted over the coming weeks, the intense media pressure demonstrates that Sarah’s Law remains a live political issue.

It was named after the schoolgirl Sarah Payne, who was murdered in 2000 by Roy Whiting, and is intended to be a UK version of “Megan’s Law”—the US system whereby parents are notified of convicted sex offenders in their area. The main force behind Sarah’s Law is the News of the World although it is assisted by other tabloid newspapers and certain pressure groups. Sarah’s Law has never been fully explained in terms of how it will work in practice other than to say it will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll