header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Alisdair Gillespie
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Child law , Community care
printer mail-detail

Smoke and mirrors

Legislating for Sarah's Law is unnecessary and will not make our children any safer, says Alisdair Gillespie

The tabloid press got excited earlier this month about the fact that “Sarah’s Law” was going to be piloted in certain parts of England and Wales. Although the Home Office quickly announced that it would not be piloted but rather a small number of procedural measures had been discussed which would be piloted over the coming weeks, the intense media pressure demonstrates that Sarah’s Law remains a live political issue.

It was named after the schoolgirl Sarah Payne, who was murdered in 2000 by Roy Whiting, and is intended to be a UK version of “Megan’s Law”—the US system whereby parents are notified of convicted sex offenders in their area. The main force behind Sarah’s Law is the News of the World although it is assisted by other tabloid newspapers and certain pressure groups. Sarah’s Law has never been fully explained in terms of how it will work in practice other than to say it will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll