header-logo header-logo

Smoking guns & cross-examination: Lord Neuberger

03 March 2017
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The UK’s most senior judge has questioned the value of disclosure of documents and cross-examination of witnesses.

Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, expressed his “rather heretical” view during the Neill lecture to the University of Oxford’s Faculty of Law.

He said he was sceptical that many cases were “decided by a ‘smoking gun’ found on the often enormously time consuming and expensive exercise of disclosure and inspection of documents”. Where a “smoking gun” was found, the case would often have been decided the same way and more cheaply without disclosure, he said. Moreover, “further down the litigation road, apparently smoking guns frequently turn out not to be smoking or even guns”.

“As for cross-examination, most of the best points that emerge from questioning can be made much more shortly in argument,” he said.

Lord Neuberger is due to step down in the autumn. An appointments exercise is currently under way to find his successor.

Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll