header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Smoking guns & cross-examination: Lord Neuberger

The UK’s most senior judge has questioned the value of disclosure of documents and cross-examination of witnesses.

Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, expressed his “rather heretical” view during the Neill lecture to the University of Oxford’s Faculty of Law.

He said he was sceptical that many cases were “decided by a ‘smoking gun’ found on the often enormously time consuming and expensive exercise of disclosure and inspection of documents”. Where a “smoking gun” was found, the case would often have been decided the same way and more cheaply without disclosure, he said. Moreover, “further down the litigation road, apparently smoking guns frequently turn out not to be smoking or even guns”.

“As for cross-examination, most of the best points that emerge from questioning can be made much more shortly in argument,” he said.

Lord Neuberger is due to step down in the autumn. An appointments exercise is currently under way to find his successor.

Issue: 7736 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll