header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-detail

SO-SO ESO

In brief

European Commission plans to introduce a European supervision order (ESO) for use across the EU are largely welcome but need improving, says the House of Lords EU Committee. The ESO would allow many of those accused of crimes in other EU states to return home rather than await trial in a foreign jail. This, the committee says in its report, European Supervision Order, would prevent thousands of people—who in their own state would be granted bail—being locked up abroad because of fears that they might abscond. The committee, however, has concerns regarding the lack of a mechanism for discussion between the trial and supervising states, and asserts that ESOs should not be issued without such consultation.

Issue: 7284 / Categories: Legal News , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll