header-logo header-logo

24 November 2017 / John van der Luit-Drummond
Issue: 7771 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

So you think you can manage?

nlj_7771_drummond

LPMA veterans Christine Kings & Edith Robertson (share a master class in practice management with John van der Luit-Drummond

It was at an Inns of Court conference in 1994 that Christine Kings realised real change was finally coming to the Bar. During a Q&A session before 300 lawyers on what a practice manager did, and why a chambers might employ one, a clerk stood up and asked her: ‘What do they pay you?’. As a sudden hush descended upon the conference floor. Kings replied that she was paid in line with the Bar Council’s recommendation of £44,000 for a practice manager salary.

‘As far as he was concerned, this was like saying, “Ha, you’re rubbish. You’re only paid £44,000 a year,” but you could’ve heard a pin drop in that room. You could see all these barristers thinking: “£44,000 per year for someone to run our chambers? And we’re paying 7% of our income to senior clerks?” That, I think, was a turning point. The Bar suddenly realised it could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll