header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Hill (by her litigation friend, Rudyard Thorpe) v Fellowes (a firm [2011] EWHC 61 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 157 (Jan)

A solicitor was generally only required to make inquiries as to a person’s capacity to contract if there were circumstances such as to raise doubt in the mind of a reasonably competent practitioner. The relevant test where professional negligence was alleged, however, was not whether someone should have been more careful.

The standard of care was not that of a particularly meticulous and conscientious practitioner. The test was what a reasonably competent practitioner would do having regard to the standards normally adopted in his profession. There was plainly no duty upon solicitors in general to obtain medical evidence on every occasion upon which they were instructed by an elderly client just in case they lacked capacity. Such a requirement would be insulting and unnecessary. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll