header-logo header-logo

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2011] EWHC 291 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 320 (Mar)

It was established law that the purposes of the imposition of sanctions on defaulting solicitors were three-fold:

(i) in some cases there might be a punitive element in order to punish the solicitor, if he had not been dealt with by the courts, and to deter others, however, such orders were not primarily punitive and often the order was not punitive in intention;

(ii) the order might be intended to ensure that the solicitor did not have the opportunity to repeat the offence; an order of suspension or striking off might achieve that in varying degrees; and, most fundamentally

(iii) the order was intended to maintain public confidence in the solicitors’ profession and its reputation. Further, because such orders were not primarily punitive, personal mitigation was likely to be of less effect. Nevertheless, the solicitors’ disciplinary tribunal also had to take into account the rights of the solicitor under Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll