header-logo header-logo

Solicitor

07 April 2011
Issue: 7460 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2011] EWHC 291 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 320 (Mar)

It was established law that the purposes of the imposition of sanctions on defaulting solicitors were three-fold:

(i) in some cases there might be a punitive element in order to punish the solicitor, if he had not been dealt with by the courts, and to deter others, however, such orders were not primarily punitive and often the order was not punitive in intention;

(ii) the order might be intended to ensure that the solicitor did not have the opportunity to repeat the offence; an order of suspension or striking off might achieve that in varying degrees; and, most fundamentally

(iii) the order was intended to maintain public confidence in the solicitors’ profession and its reputation. Further, because such orders were not primarily punitive, personal mitigation was likely to be of less effect. Nevertheless, the solicitors’ disciplinary tribunal also had to take into account the rights of the solicitor under Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll