header-logo header-logo

14 October 2016
Issue: 7718 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Connaught Income Fund, Series 1 (in liquidation) v Hewetts Solicitors (a former firm) [2016] EWHC 2286 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 90 (Sep)

The Chancery Division dismissed the claimant lender’s claim for damages for professional negligence against the defendant firm of solicitors where the allegations had not been established, save in one instance. The lender had claimed it had relied on a certificate of title (COT) produced by the defendant solicitors, who had been instructed by the first instance borrowers, in authorising draw-down on a loan for the purchase of a property by the eventual borrower. The court held that solicitors, in circumstances such as in the present case, did not owe to the lender the wider duty as set out in Mortgage Express Ltd v Bowerman & Partners Ltd [1996] 2 All ER 836, but rather owed a duty limited to exercising due skill and care when speaking in the form of the COT.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll