header-logo header-logo

19 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Solicitor

Barnaby v Raleys [2013] Lexis Citation 59, [2013] All ER (D) 63 (Sep)

It was established law that in order for a court to make a finding of professional negligence against a solicitor it would first have to be determined whether there had in fact been a breach of duty. Second, if there had been, the court had to then ask whether the breach caused or materially contributed to the claimant’s alleged loss. Third, the court had to decide if the claimant had lost something of value in the sense that his prospects of success were more than negligible. Fourth, if the court decided that the claimant had lost a claim with more than a negligible prospect of success, it had to make a realistic assessment of what those prospects of success were. Finally, the court would need to make an assessment of what the likely value of the claim was having taken account of the prospects of success.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll