header-logo header-logo

09 October 2025
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitor president vows to prioritise social mobility

Property law specialist and University of Law lecturer Mark Evans has been inaugurated as the Law Society’s 181st president

Evans, who is the society’s third president from Wales, practised as a property and private law solicitor at Allington Hughes for 28 years before moving into education—experience which may come in handy given the government is currently consulting on home-buying and conveyancing reforms. During his term, Evans said he will focus on tackling social mobility barriers to the profession, promoting mental health and wellbeing, and boosting awareness of legal aid ‘deserts’ around the country where ‘solicitor numbers are declining and communities are struggling to access legal advice and justice.

‘To help address this, I want to highlight non-traditional routes into the profession and help to equip small and medium-sized law firms with the tools they need to ensure access to justice,’ Evans said.

One specific goal is to persuade the Welsh government to match the offer available in England and fund the level 7 apprenticeship so students can stay and train in Wales. He also intends to support solicitors in managing their own welfare.

Evans said: ‘Long hours, high workloads and client care can have an impact on solicitors.

‘It is critical that we continue the conversation about mental health and wellbeing and ensure that it is not stigmatised. This year, I aim to support solicitors by holding crucial discussions on wellbeing across the legal sector and by engaging with local law societies, communities and networks to ensure we are united in prioritising our members’ welfare.’

Evans will be supported by vice president Brett Dixon, a former president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers, and deputy vice president Dana Denis-Smith, the entrepreneur behind flexible working company Obelisk Support and founder of the First 100 Years project. 

Issue: 8135 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll