header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitors

Davis v Solicitor’s Regulation Authority [2011] All ER (D) 177 (Dec)

In considering an appeal from a decision of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to refuse to enroll the appellant as a solicitor following her failure to disclose a driving conviction on the advice of her supervisor, the court found that the appellant had not initially had a viewpoint of her own; the advice she had received had created her viewpoint. Although the advice she had received had been bad advice, it was unreasonable to criticise the appellant for having accepted advice from people she believed were in a position to give her good advice. Accordingly, the decision of the SRA had not been one that had
been open to the SRA to reach.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll