header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitors

Chaudery v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2012] EWHC 372 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 86 (Apr)

Case law made it clear that the question of dishonesty of a solicitor was an important matter to be investigated and determined by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The same approach applied to those seeking admission as to those who had already been admitted. Offences of dishonesty were correctly regarded as of the greatest importance. The reputation of the profession relied upon the honesty and good faith of its members. In cases of proven dishonesty, the solicitor would almost always be struck off, however strong the personal mitigation.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll