header-logo header-logo

30 January 2026 / Victoria Morrison-Hughes
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Regulatory , Legal services , Fees , Costs
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Act: Time for reform

241432
The Solicitors Act 1974 belongs to a world of dusty volumes in oak-panelled libraries, writes Victoria Morrison-Hughes

The Solicitors Act 1974 has been the cornerstone of legal regulation in England and Wales for more than half a century, governing the admission of solicitors to the roll, practising certificates, professional discipline, and costs.

Drafted in a pre-digital era, when Ceefax, fax machines and photocopiers were cutting edge, it belongs to a world where lawyers researched from dusty volumes in oak-panelled libraries. Clients rarely challenged their solicitors’ bills because they trusted the profession.

Fast forward to 2025. Artificial intelligence (AI) churns out documents in seconds; lawyers spend their days squinting at blue-light screens, trying to separate genuine insight from hallucinations. The legal landscape has transformed, but the Solicitors Act 1974, despite amendments, has not. It is out of step with modern consumer law, leaving both clients and solicitors struggling to navigate its complexity.

Consumer confusion & regulatory fog

Many clients remain confused about who regulates who, what protections

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll