header-logo header-logo

Solicitors—Disciplinary proceedings—Dishonesty

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison [2012] EWCA Civ 421, [2012] All ER (D) 58 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Maurice Kay, Hooper and Moore-Bick LJJ, 3 Apr 2012
The solicitors disciplinary tribunal (the tribunal) comprises an expert and informed tribunal which is particularly well placed in any case to assess what measures are required to deal with defaulting solicitors and to protect the public interest, nevertheless the High Court will interfere if it is satisfied that a sentencing decision is clearly inappropriate.

Michael McLaren QC and Richard Coleman (instructed by Jonathan Goodwin, Chester) for the SRA. Simon Monty QC (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP, Manchester) for the defendant.

The defendant solicitor had an interest in a company (the company) which acted as an intermediary for obtaining expert evidence in support of claims handled by solicitors on The Accident Group (TAG) panel. The TAG panel operated a claims management scheme involving the sourcing, funding and representation of claimants in personal injury cases. The defendant was employed by a firm of solicitors (the firm) which had been involved

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll